z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Two Ways of Constructing Social Philosophy
Author(s) -
Валентина Гавриловна Федотова
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
filosofskie nauki
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2618-8961
pISSN - 0235-1188
DOI - 10.30727/0235-1188-2018-6-127-131
Subject(s) - modernity , sociology , epistemology , social philosophy , interpretation (philosophy) , social change , aesthetics , social science , social relation , philosophy , political science , law , linguistics
The article discusses the question of what social philosophy is and how it is constructed. On the one hand, this is an area of philosophy that focuses on a set of social problems and attributes through the lens of the naturalistic research program, which considers these attributes as similar to some type of “things.” On the other hand, cultural-centric program solves the question of how and when philosophy itself became social: starting with modernity and its processional characteristics, i.e. - in the first, in the second and the third modernity, in the processes of globalization and other social transformations, in processionality of identity, ethnicity, etc. Both modes of research are outlined, and emphasis is placed on the advantages of the cultural-centrist research program. The philosophy of the first - liberal modernity of the 19 th century, the second - organized modernity of the 20th century, the processes of the 21 st century, opening up a new type of modernity - new Modernity for non-Western countries, is the social philosophy of processes, paying special attention not to the aspectual, quasi-concrete interpretation of the summable features of social reality but to processes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here