z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Legitimacy for some
Author(s) -
Fredrik Portin
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
scripta instituti donneriani aboensis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2343-4937
pISSN - 0582-3226
DOI - 10.30674/scripta.70066
Subject(s) - populism , legitimacy , right wing , politics , public sphere , sociology , character (mathematics) , democratic legitimacy , democracy , agonism , element (criminal law) , political science , epistemology , law , philosophy , geometry , mathematics
The purpose of this article is to examine under what conditions the disruptive character of right-wing populism can be perceived as a positive element within a functioning democracy. Using the thinking of philosophers Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe I argue that the disruptive character of right-wing populism gives the marginalised concerns of ‘the people’ public legitimacy. However, right-wing populism is also criticised for excluding, in a similar fashion, certain social actors from the public sphere. Instead of enabling a more inclusive society, I therefore argue that right-wing populism enables a society that is distinguished by antagonism. To make it possible for all social actors’ concerns to gain public legitimacy without promoting antagonism, I argue that a new political reality needs to be imagined. In conclusion I therefore offer a theoretical framework for such a reality through the political philosophy of Bruno Latour.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here