z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Risk and Crisis Communication about Invisible Hazards
Author(s) -
Ruth Østgaard Skotnes,
Kåre Hansen,
Anne Vatland Krøvel
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of international crisis and risk communication research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2576-0025
pISSN - 2576-0017
DOI - 10.30658/jicrcr.4.2.9
Subject(s) - risk perception , risk communication , hazard , crisis communication , perception , business , affect (linguistics) , environmental hazard , internet privacy , public relations , risk analysis (engineering) , psychology , political science , computer science , medicine , communication , chemistry , organic chemistry , pathology , neuroscience
This article discusses differences between invisible and visible hazards, and how these differences can affect risk and crisis communication. Invisible hazards are risks that we cannot see, and often cannot touch, taste, nor smell. Examples are COVID-19, radon gas, mold spores, or asbestos fibers. Invisible hazards are often uncertain, complex, and ambiguous risk problems. Results from a Norwegian study show that authorities need to be aware of the possible differences in risk perception among authorities, stakeholders, and the general public. Involving citizens, creating trust, and being honest is important for all risk and crisis communication. However, the less we know about a hazard, the more we need to rely on others to make decisions, and consequently trust is particularly important when dealing with invisible hazards.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here