Open AccessPenggusuran Pedagang Kaki Lima Sebagai Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum
Author(s) -
Akmal Adicahya
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
justitia jurnal hukum/justitia : jurnal hukum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2579-9983
pISSN - 2579-6380
DOI - 10.30651/justitia.v1i1.600
Subject(s) - creditor , collateral , mortgage insurance , business , shared appreciation mortgage , debt , lien , financial system , finance , insurance policy , casualty insurance
Mortgage abolishment because the expiration of the Right of Exploitation (HGU) , Right of Building (HGB), and Right of Use burdened not cause the abolishment of collateralized debt obligations. Duration HGU, HGB and wear rights expire, then the mortgage that is charged against the land becomes clear. This additional agreement means clear. Instead principal agreement (credit agreement) is not necessarily to be clear, and move on. In this case resulted in the creditors are in a weak position because of unpaid debts, Mortgage over land as collateral to remove. This study discusses the normative legal efforts to do the lender to avoid the possible risk of the abolishment of land rights based on Law Number 42 Year 1996, which includes the manufacture of promise land extend rights in the imposition of mortgage deed, power of attorney making mortgage charging time HGB changes become ownership rights residential, Object insurance burden for advantage mortgage holder mortgage, debitor to request additional collateral