Open AccessEmotional labor assessments and episodic recall bias in public engagement
Author(s) -
William G. Resh,
Cynthia Wilkes,
Carmen Mooradian
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of behavioral public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2576-6465
DOI - 10.30636/jbpa.32.138
Subject(s) - psychology , remuneration , prosocial behavior , emotional labor , social psychology , recall , set (abstract data type) , public service motivation , burnout , test (biology) , affect (linguistics) , employee engagement , function (biology) , reinforcement , public sector , public relations , cognitive psychology , clinical psychology , political science , paleontology , communication , evolutionary biology , computer science , law , biology , programming language
In a survey of local officials in Los Angeles County we test individual-level job-related assessments as a function of a public employee’s induced recall of discrete citizen engagement and one’s intrinsic prosocial motivation through a randomized survey experiment. We explore whether tangible retentions of public service influence the relationship between self-concepts—such as reported prosociality—and job-related assessments. We find that the relationship between self-reports of prosociality and pay satisfaction are contingent upon those concepts being decontextualized, whereas discrete recall bias appears not to affect emotional burnout. In other words, subjects seem to accept the emotional labor of engagement as part of their jobs. However, contextualizing engagement may make them more cognizant of its unremunerated dimensions; and, positive reinforcement of engagement provides encouragement to further engagement. Our findings make the case that emotional labor involves a skill set that employees implicitly recognize merits remuneration and that reinforcing positive engagement outcomes inspires employee motivation.