Open AccessComparison of stone clearance rate in patients with distal ureteric stones, undergoing URS with and without a safety guide wire.
Author(s) -
Zulfiqar Ahmad,
Kaleem Ullah,
Bilal Ahmed,
Safdar Saeed,
Usman Qamar,
Pardeep Kumar
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2021.28.12.6465
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , urology , group b
Objective: To compare stone clearance rate in patients with distal ureteric stones, undergoing URS with safety guide wire and without safety guide wire. Study Design: Randomized Clinical Trial study. Setting: Department of Urology, Pir Abdul Qadir Shah Institute of Medical sciences. Period: January, 2020 to December 2020. Material & Methods: The study patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were divided into two groups using the lottery method. Group A: Patients underwent URS with insertion of safety guidewire (SGW). Group B: These patients underwent URS without safety guidewire (SGW). Patients in both groups were compared for stone clearance. Results: Mean age in Group A was 37.79±12.44 years and in Group B were 33.31±11.48 years. Group wise distribution of gender showed 79 (73.83%) male and 28 (26.17%) females in Group A and 70(65.42%) male and 37 female (34.57%) in Group B. In comparison of both groups, 65.42% stone clearance was noted in Group A while 78.50% stone clearance was found in Group B and p-value found to be significant (P=0.033). Conclusion: Our study concluded that stone clearance in patients with distal ureteral stones undergoing URS without SGW is higher in comparison to URS with SGW, without any added advantage.