Open AccessINCISIONAL HERNIA SURGERY
Author(s) -
Ammara Liaquat,
Rizwan Ahmad,
Amna Liaquat
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2018.25.09.54
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , statistical significance , complication , statistical analysis , statistics , mathematics
Objectives: To evaluate the postoperative complication of different incisionalhernia repair techniques; preperitoneal repair, onlay repair, and laparoscopic IPOM. StudyDesign: Randomized control trial. Setting: Multan Medical and Dental College Multan. Period:One year duration from June 2016 to June 2017. Methodology: Collected data was analyzedby using SPSS statistical software), mean and standard deviation was calculated for continuousdata and frequencies with percentages (%) were calculated and presented for qualitative data.P value ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Total 90 patients enrolled in this study,both genders. There were 65.6% (n=59) men and 34.4% (n=31) women. Patients who weretreated with preperitoneal repair were able to perform forceful activities in earlier time whencompared to those who were treated with onlay repair at 11th weeks. The differences werestatistically significant. Conclusion: The observations of our study revealed that LaproscopicIPOM was found to be effective and easy for patient compliance and level of satisfaction interms of CCS scoring system with regard to occurrence of complications, appearance of theabdominal wall without laxity in a single sitting and to resume daily activities.