
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
Author(s) -
Mustma Kamal,
Naveed Akhtar,
Ghulam Murtaza,
Najaf Azad
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2018.25.07.128
Subject(s) - medicine , cholecystectomy , gallstones , surgery , incidence (geometry) , complication , laparoscopic cholecystectomy , randomized controlled trial , population , physics , environmental health , optics
Background: Gallstones and biliary sludge accounted for 30–55% of acutepancreatitis in the West whereas in other countries the incidence of all cases of pancreatitisamounts up to 68.5%. The risk of subsequent attacks for patients recovering from the firstattack of acute biliary pancreatitis is 30-fold higher than general population. Further attackscan be prevented by cholecystectomy. Both immediate and delayed cholecystectomies areused with different degree of success and complication rates. Objectives: To compare thefrequencies of complications in early and late cholecystectomy in cases of mild acute biliarypancreatitis. Material & Methods:… Study Design: Randomized control trial. Setting: Surgicalunit I Nishtar Medical College/ Hospital Multan. Duration of Study: 2 years from 1-1-2015 to31-12-3016. Sample Size: Total 172 patients, 86 in each group. Sampling Technique: Nonprobability,consecutive sampling. Results: In this study there were total 172 cases out ofwhich 89 (51.74%) were males and 83 (48.26%) females. The mean age was 42.02± 6.36 yearsand mean duration of symptoms was 4.08± 2.54 days. Mean duration of surgery was 53.30±6.30 minutes. There were 47 males in the group undergoing early cholecystectomy and 39 indelayed with p= 0.44. Both groups had maximum cases in age group of 40-50 year with p=0.39. There was no significant difference in terms of duration of symptoms (p=0.26) in bothgroups. There was significant difference in terms of prolonged duration of surgery where it wasseen in 8 (9.30%) out of 86 cases with early as compared to 2 (2.33%) out of 86 cases withdelayed cholecystectomy with p value of 0.05. Prolonged duration of hospital stay was alsomore seen in early cholecystectomy as compared to delayed one, seen in 10 (11.63) cases inearly and 4 (4.65%) cases with delayed surgery in their respective groups with p= 0.09. Therewas significant difference (p= 0.008) in terms of per operative complication with early surgerywhere it affected the 18 (20.93%) cases as compared to delayed one with 6 (6.95%) cases.There was again significant difference shown in terms of recurrence of pancreatitis which wasseen in 7 (8.14%) of cases with early as compared to 1 (1.16%) with delayed surgery withp= 0.03. Conclusion: Early and late cholecystectomies both are performed in tertiary carehospitals. The late cholecystectomy has shown significantly lower per operative complications,duration of surgery and chances of the recurrent pancreatitis.