PARA UMBILICAL HERNIAS

Background: Para-umbilical hernias are the common hernias among ventralabdominal hernias constituting about 85% of the overall abdominal wall hernias. Due to theirhigh risk of complications, adult paraumbilical hernias needs surgical repair. Objectives: Tocompare effectiveness of mesh versus mayo’s repair of para umbilical hernias in terms of postoperativepain. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Surgical Department,Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Period: 12 months. Materials and Methods: A totalof 162 patients with paraumblical hernia were repaired. They were equally divided into 2 groupswith mesh repair (group A) and Mayo’s repair (Group B). The intervention effectiveness of meshversus mayo’s repair of para umbilical hernias was measured in terms of post-operative painby Visual Analogue Scale at the end of 3rd month. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version17. Chi Square Test was used p Value < 0.05 was significant. All the results were presentedin the form of tables and charts. Results: Mean age in (Mesh repair) was 30 years ± 2.1SDwhereas mean age in (Mayos repair) was 28 years ± 1.71SD. In Group A (Mesh repair), 73(90%)patients had mild pain (VAS 0-3), 8(10%) patients had moderate pain (VAS 4-6). In Group B(Mayos repair), 63(78%) patients had mild pain (VAS 0-3), 16(20%) patients had moderate painscore (VAS 4-6), 2(2%) patients had severe pain score (VAS 7-10). Mesh repair was effective in73(90%) patients whereas Mayos repair was effective in 63 (78%) patients. Conclusion: Meshrepair is more effective in terms of post-operative pain than Mayos repair.