Open AccessTIBIAL DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES;
Author(s) -
Sajid Iqbal,
Hafiz Salman Saeed,
Bushra Aslam,
Iqra Fayyaz
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2017.24.09.902
Subject(s) - medicine , intramedullary rod , surgery , internal fixation , delayed union , radiological weapon , fixation (population genetics) , nonunion , population , environmental health
Objectives: To evaluate the management of tibial diaphyseal fractures treated byPOP cast versus intramedullary nailing in terms of time of union. Design of study: Randomizedcontrolled trials. Setting: Department of Orthopaedic, Allied / DHQ Hospital, Faisalabad.Duration of Study: Six months (01-08-2013 to 31-01-2014). Materials and Methods: 80patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. After laboratoryand radiological assessment, the patients in Group 1 were treated by long leg cast. The patientsin Group 2 were treated with intramedullary interlocking nail. The patients were followed on OPDbasis. Results: 80 patients divided into 2 groups. Each group had 40 patients. Mean age ofpatients was 30.99 ±8.092 years. There were total of 65% males and 35% females in this study.According to geometry of fractures simple transverse fractures were 47.5%, spiral fractureswere 17.5%, oblique fractures were 25% and segmental fractures were 10%. There were 71.25%closed fracture and 28.75% type l open fractures. Mean time of union was 23.86 ± 5.48 weeks ingroup 1 while in group 2, mean time of union was 18.35 ± 4.12 weeks. P-value was 0.001 whichis statistically significant. Conclusion: It is concluded that reamed intramedullary interlockingnailing is a good mode of internal fixation comparing with conservative management of closereduction and POP cast in both close and type I open fractures in terms of union.