z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
BREAST ABSCESS;
Author(s) -
Muhammad Umar Javed,
Sidra Aleem,
Sheraz Jamil Asif,
Javed Iqbal
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2017.24.01.484
Subject(s) - medicine , abscess , incision and drainage , surgery , randomized controlled trial , group b
Objectives: To compare the recurrence rate between incision drainage andmultiple needle aspiration for breast abscess treatment. Study Design: Randomized ControlledTrial. Setting: Department of General Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur. StudyDuration: 29th September 2015 to 29th June 2016. Materials & Methods: A total of 60 femalepatients with breast abscess of <2 cm in size and of duration <2 weeks between 20 to 40 yearsof age were included. Patients with multiple breast abscesses, recurrent breast abscesses andcomplicated abscesses were excluded. The patients were randomized into Group A (incisionand drainage) & Group B (needle aspiration), by using lottery method. Follow up was done forup to 7 days and recurrence was noted. Results: The mean age of patients in group A was30.83 ± 5.67 years and in group B was 31.53 ± 5.73 years. Mean duration of disease was 7.58± 2.83 days. Mean size of abscess was 0.86 ± 0.43 cm. Recurrence was found in 07 (23.33%)patients in group A (incision drainage) while in 21 (70.0%) patients in group B (multiple needleaspiration) with p-value of 0.000 which is statistically significant. Conclusion: The recurrencerate is less after incision & drainage as compared to multiple needle aspirations for treatingbreast abscess.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here