HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY;

Haemorrhoids are one of the most common anorectal disorders. Internalhaemorrhoids are symptomatic anal cushions and characteristically lie in the 3, 7 and 11 o’clockposition whereas external haemorrhoids relate to venous channels of the inferior haemorrhoidalplexus. Objectives: To compare the outcome of haemorrhoidectomy using harmonic scalpelversus conventional closed haemorrhoidectomy. Study Design: Randomized control trial.Setting: Department of Surgical unit II, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore. Period: Six months from 25thDecember 2014 to 24th June 2015. Methodology: A total of 140 patients were included inthis study. Patients were divided in two groups A & B. In Group A, (70 patients) conventionalhaemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Ferguson Technique (closed technique) whereasin Group B, (70 patients) suture less closed haemorrhoidectomy was performed by using theharmonic scalpel. Results: The mean age of the patients in group A was 43.3±8.2 years andin group B was 42.3±7.3 years. The mean time for surgery in group A was 23.8±4.2 minutesand in group B was 8.5±3.6 minutes. The mean pain score in group A was 5.3±1.8 VAS andin group B was 3.9±1.9 VAS. In group A, less than 1 day postoperative hospital stay was in 62(88.6%) patients and in group B, it was in 66 (94.3%) patients. Conclusions: It is concludedfrom this study that haemorrhoidectomy by harmonic scalpel results in decrease in operationtime and less postoperative pain although there is not much significant difference in less than 1day hospital stay as compared to the conventional closed haemorrhidectomy technique.