z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION;
Author(s) -
Syed Iftikhar Alam,
Muhammad Yunas Khan,
Ayaz Gul,
Qutbi Alam Jan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2014.21.02.2066
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , complication , audit , wound infection , general surgery , management , economics
Objective: To assess the post operative wound complication after opencholecystectomy for uncomplicated Cholelithiasis. Design: Cross sectional descriptive. Setting:Surgical unit of Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar Pakistan. Patients: 223 patients underwentelective open cholecystectomy January 2011 to July 2012. Results: 90% patients had normalhealing (grade 0 or I) ,7.5% had minor complications (grade II or III), 2.5% patients had majorcomplication (grade IV or V) recorded during hospital stay. On follow-up in out-patientdepartment 81%patients found to have normal healing (grade 0 or I), 15% patients had minorcomplications (grade II or III) and 4% patients had major complications (grade IV or V). There wasan increase noted in wound grades during follow up for surgical site infections as compared totheir record during hospital stay. Conclusions: Southampton wound scoring system is a usefultool for detection of surgical site infection and standardization. Auditing of surgical site infectionby Southampton wound scoring will help the patient, surgical team and sterilization protocol tobe improved.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here