z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
SHOULDICE VERSUS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR
Author(s) -
Waseem Sadiq Awan,
Muhammad Rehman Gulzar,
Ghulam Mustafa Arain,
Raza Younus
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2010.17.03.2472
Subject(s) - medicine , seroma , surgery , inguinal hernia , hernia , complication
Objective: To compare the results of tissue based Shouldice repair with the Lichtenstein tension free repair of inguinal hernia. Design: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Period: From Jan 2004 to Dec 2006. Setting: Surgical Unit-II, Allama Iqbal Medical College / Jinnah Hospital Lahore, Pakistan. Patients & Methods: A total of 156 patients were included in this study were equally divided into two groups. Results: The mean age was 45 years. After a follow up of upto 2 years there was significant difference in the recurrence rate. It was 5% in the Shouldice group and 1.28 %in the Lichtenstein group. Similarly chronic pain was also much higher i.e. 5% in the Shouldice group compared to 1.28% in Lichtenstein Group. The rate of hematoma and seroma formation was the same (1.28%) in both groups, however infection was seen slightly more in Lichtenstein repair (3.84%) as compared to Shouldice repair (2.56%). Conclusion: Tension free Lichtenstein technique was found to be superior to the tissue based Shouldice repair with respect to post operative complications and recurrence.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here