
PR0P0F0L VS. THIOPENTAL NA
Author(s) -
Farnoush Farzi,
M Oudi,
Marzieh Mehrafza,
Z Mohammad Tabar,
Ali Mirmansouri,
Ahmad Hoseeini
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2009.16.04.2741
Subject(s) - propofol , medicine , intracytoplasmic sperm injection , nausea , vomiting , gynecology , anesthesia , oocyte , pregnancy rate , pregnancy , embryo , infertility , biology , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology
O b j e c t i v e : The aim of this study was to compare the side effects, fertilization rate and pregnancy rate (PR) and duration ofrecovery between Propofol and Thiopental Na after ICSI-vaginal retrieval of oocyte in ART cycle. D e s i g n : This study was a prospective,randomized clinical trial Materials and M e t h o d s : Ninety eight ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologist) physical status I and II womenparticipating in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection) ICSI) program were assessed. All of the patients underwent general anesthesia inductionwith Propofol and Thiopental Na. The first group (49cycles) received 2-2.5mg/kg of Propofol, and the second group (49cycles) received 5mg/kgThiopental during transvaginal oocyte retrieval. An informed consent form was obtained for each patients treatment. Variables under studyincluded: female age, cause and duration of infertiIity^postoperative nausea and vomiting(PONV), heamodynamic changes, mean number ofoocyte retrieved, oocyte metaphase II, embryo cleaved, embryo transferred, embryo quality and pregnancy rate(PR)and duration recovery.Statistical analysis was carried out by using SPSS.10 software and statistical test of T-test and chi-square. R e s u l t s : The PR in Propofol groupwas 18(36.7%) and in Thiopental Na group was 19(38.8%) with no significant differences the mean duration of infertility and weight weren'tstatistically significant. The mean number of oocyte retrieved (metaphase II), embryo cleaved, embryo transferred and embryo quality weren'tsignificant between the two groups. The incidence of nausea in Propofol group in comparison with Thiopental Na group was lower withsignificant differences. The incidence of vomiting between two groups was statistically significant (46.9% vs.28.6% respectively)(P<0.05).between two groups. Duration of recovery in Propofol group was 15+/_3min and in Thiopental Na group was 25+/_5 min that was statisticallysignificant(P<0.05). C o n c l u s i o n s : Propofol offered lower incidence of post operative nausea and vomiting and a quick recovery from anesthesia without any adverse effect on pregnancy outcome. These findings showed that Propofol was a good alternative for Thiopental Na in short timeoperation, like ICSI -vaginal retrieval of oocytes.