Open AccessURO-DYNAMIC EVALUATION
Author(s) -
Saquib Hanif Janjua,
Tariq Mehmood,
Rehana Yasmin,
Zaheer Ahmed Gill,
M. Farooq Azam Rathore,
Maqsood Ui Hasan,
Pervaiz Hasan Khan Niazi,
Aamir Waheed Butt
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2008.15.03.2826
Subject(s) - medicine , referral , etiology , stress incontinence , urodynamic studies , urinary incontinence , physical therapy , surgery , family medicine
Objective: To describe the pattern of Urodynamic evaluation at ArmedForces Institute of Rehab Medicine, Rawalpindi. Study Design: Descriptive study. Materials and Methods: This studywas conducted on 466 patients reporting for urodynamic evaluation at Urodynamic/Incontinence Clinic at A F Instituteof Rehab Medicine from Feb 2003 to Dec 2006. We considered the age, gender, etiology, reason for referral, andpresenting complaints whereas results were formulated according to Classification of voiding disorders by Internationalsociety of Incontinence. Data was analyzed using statistical package forSocial Science version 10. Results: In all (466)patients, 58% were males and 42% were females. Mean age was 46.8 years. Increased frequency (61%) andincontinence (52%) were the most common presenting complaints, 158(34%) had spinal cord injuries, 58 were casesof myelodysplasias and 128 reported with stress incontinence. Urodynamic studies showed that 152(33%) hadhyperactive bladders, 110(24%) had a contractile/hypo-contractile bladders, 104(22%) had stress incontinence and56(12%) cases had normal results. Conclusion: Urodynamics helps in diagnosis of potentially life threatening urinaryproblems. The availability of this equipment and trained staff must be encouraged at tertiary care hospital. Moreresearch is required in this regard in Pakistan, which shall help in formulating better management protocols in future