Open AccessPOLYTRAUMA
Author(s) -
Muhammad Azhar Qureshi
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/2006.13.01.5059
Subject(s) - polytrauma , medicine , triage , injury severity score , epidemiology , trauma center , emergency medicine , medical emergency , injury prevention , poison control , surgery , retrospective cohort study
Objective: To study the epidemiology of trauma and prognostic significanceof various trauma score systems. Design: A multi-center descriptive study Place and duration of study: The studywas conducted from July 1995 to March 2005 comprising almost 10 years in services hospitals of Lahore, Malir, Sialkot,and Mianwali. Patients and Methods: 271 patients of various age groups were studied. Cases were grouped as burns,head injuries and multisystem injuries and were managed according to Advance Trauma Life Support (ALTS) andparameters of various trauma scores recorded and compared with outcome. Results: Probability of survival ascalculated by TRISS methodology has better prognostic significance than various trauma score systems alone. Thestudy revealed low specificity in all types of injuries showing late deaths and unexpected complications. Revised TraumaScore and TRISS methodology were more accurate in multiple injuries than in burn and head injuries. Conclusion:Revised Trauma Score (RTS) is useful tool as triage and prognostic indicator for multiple injuries but not in cases ofburns and head injuries. We need to develop our own norms and coefficients for TRISS methodology and unexpectedoutcome should be minimized by sound clinical judgment. Moreover, we need radical improvement in burn care andneuro-surgical facilities in our country