Open AccessSINONASAL POLYPOSIS
Author(s) -
Farhan Salam,
Ejaz Ahmad,
Muhammad Salman Haider Qureshi,
Muhammad Aslam Khan
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the professional medical journal/the professional medical journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2071-7733
pISSN - 1024-8919
DOI - 10.29309/tpmj/18.4485
Subject(s) - medicine , nose , functional endoscopic sinus surgery , surgery , nasal polyps , polypectomy , ethics committee , informed consent , sinusitis , colonoscopy , cancer , pathology , alternative medicine , colorectal cancer , public administration , political science
Nasal polyposis (NP) is a chronic inflammatory disease involvingmucous membrane in paranasal sinuses and nose. It presents as gelatinous, semitranslucent,smooth, pedunculated pear or round shaped masses comprising of inflamed mucosa thatout-pouches into nose. The available surgical options are Functional Endoscopic SinusSurgery (FESS) and Conventional Intranasal Polypectomy (CIP). The study aims to compareFESS and CIP in sinonasal polyposis patient in term of symptomatic improvement. StudyDesign: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of head n’ neck surgery andOtorhinolaryngology, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad. Period: 01-01-2015 to20-08-2015. Methodology: A total of 84 patients presenting with nasal polyposis were enrolled.Out of these 84 patients, 42 patients were randomly selected for FESS (Group-A). Rest of the42 patients were selected for CIP (Group-B). All the information recorded on the Performawas entered and analysed using SPSS version 17. The entire study duration was 31 weeks.Regarding ethical consideration, the study was approved from ethics committee of hospital.Informed consent was obtained from the study participants. Moreover, confidentiality andanonymity of subjects was assured. The patients were followed-up for 2 months duration. Theentire study duration was about 8 months. Results: On the basis of scoring of nasal obstruction,in FESS Group-A, 32 (76.19%) patients had completely patent nose after two months and only10 (23.81%) patients had partially blocked nose. On the other hand in CIP Group-B, only 16(38.10%) patients had completely patent nose while 26 (60.90%) patients had partially blockednose after two months. The comparison of sense of smell between both groups also showedthat the outcome of Group-A was significantly (p-value = 0.000) better as compared to Group-B.The complete sense of smell was found present in 37 (88.10%) patients in group A in contrastwith 19 (45.23%) patients in group B. Conclusion: FESS seems to be a better treatment optionfor sinonasal polyposis than conventional intranasal polypectomy. However study with largerpopulation size and longer follow up duration is recommended to rationalize the results.