Open AccessThe United Nations: Implications of Soft Power
Author(s) -
Sara L. Montgomery
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
political science undergraduate review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2562-1289
pISSN - 2562-1270
DOI - 10.29173/psur65
Subject(s) - security council , veto , political science , league , china , soft power , peacekeeping , sovereignty , state (computer science) , intervention (counseling) , international security , human rights , international action , development economics , responsibility to protect , power (physics) , economic growth , public administration , law , politics , physics , quantum mechanics , economics , psychology , algorithm , astronomy , psychiatry , computer science
The United Nations is often looked to for guidance in conflict prevention and intervention, but its lack of hard power has proven to be extremely limiting. Although the United Nations has been a major improvement from the League of Nations, its ability to maintain world peace is restricted by the aspirations of its member states. The Security Council is especially significant, made up of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, China and Russia. Each state in the Security Council has the ability to veto any initiative proposed by the United Nations. Additionally, the United Nations cannot take action without leadership from one or more of its states, and many states are hesitant to sacrifice their military resources even in the event of major human rights violations. This hesitancy to intervene is especially evident in the case study of the Rwandan genocide, but can also be seen in the Cold War and the Syrian Civil War, amongst other conflicts.