z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
"Have I kept inquiry moving?" On the Epistemology of Reflection
Author(s) -
Bengt Molander
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
phenomenology and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1913-4711
DOI - 10.29173/pandpr19811
Subject(s) - reflection (computer programming) , epistemology , action (physics) , conversation , similarity (geometry) , point (geometry) , diversity (politics) , sociology , philosophy , psychology , computer science , mathematics , artificial intelligence , communication , physics , geometry , quantum mechanics , anthropology , image (mathematics) , programming language
Detractors of Schon's notion of "reflection in action" often point out that there is seldom time for reflection when a person is engaged in work. Such comments indicate an overly narrow conception of what reflection is. In this article it is argued that a practice, which occurs over a span of time, may be reflective without any particular activity called "reflection" being carried out. Though there is a diversity of forms of reflection in practice, it is argued that Schon's notion of "conversation"or "dialogue" can be developed so as to exhibit a structural similarity to various reflective practices. Reflection in action emerges, then, as a form of knowledge in action, as fallible as any other form of empirical knowledge.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here