z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Feminism and Intercultural Information Ethics
Author(s) -
Thomas J. Froehlich
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
international review of information ethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2563-5638
DOI - 10.29173/irie253
Subject(s) - feminism , argumentation theory , deliberation , sociology , feminist ethics , diversity (politics) , variety (cybernetics) , ethics of care , gender studies , epistemology , law , political science , philosophy , politics , anthropology , artificial intelligence , computer science
Rafael Capurro calls for an intercultural information ethics that radically challenges its Eurocentric, Greekphilosophical roots and grapples with and validates cultural diversity. One of the voices that must be includedin this project is that of feminism, both within and outside of Western culture. While there are a variety offeminist issues and approaches to feminism, embracing the naturalistic approach, suggested by AlisonJaggar, one can find sufficient commonalities, both in terms of a critique of traditional male-dominatedWestern ethics and in terms of a positive content and agenda, to establish a feminist framework. One strongvoice that help create this framework is that of Carol Gilligan who studied the moral development of women.This paper argues that the “different voice” thesis of Gilligan (i.e., that men and women prototypically – notstereotypically – bring different voices to moral argumentation and ethical deliberation) can serve as anethical principle, that permits all persons – male or female – to interrogate and guide their ethical choices,and that an ‘ethic of care’ can challenge an ‘ethic of rights,’ and on occasion can trump it as a major guidingethical principle.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here