z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Advisory Review: The Reincarnation of the Notwithstanding Clause
Author(s) -
Richard Albert
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
alberta law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1925-8356
pISSN - 0002-4821
DOI - 10.29173/alr314
Subject(s) - reincarnation , constitutionalism , law , political science , constitution , blessing , democracy , constitutional law , cornerstone , law and economics , sociology , philosophy , history , epistemology , theology , archaeology , politics
The notwithstanding clause is the cornerstone of our Canadian constitutional architecture. It has a high ambition to reconcile constitutionalism with democracy. But the notwithstanding clause finds itself conceptually situated between illegitimacy and desuetude in a constitutional purgatory. This is not a promising portrait. Nonetheless, it is a blessing in disguise. The tragic failure of the notwithstanding clause is a fortuitous opportunity to create a new process that will allow us to achieve its objectives while also remaining loyal to the intentions of its creators. This new process - which the author calls advisory review - is a new form of judicial review that is uniquely Canadian, born of Canadian roots, and consistent with Canadian constitutional traditions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here