z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Supreme Court, Functional Bilingualism, and the Indigenous Candidate: Reconciling the Bench
Author(s) -
Alexandrea Nasager
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
alberta law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1925-8356
pISSN - 0002-4821
DOI - 10.29173/alr2595
Subject(s) - indigenous , supreme court , viewpoints , representation (politics) , diversity (politics) , neuroscience of multilingualism , law , political science , sociology , psychology , art , ecology , neuroscience , politics , visual arts , biology
The recent reforms to the Supreme Court of Canada appointment process have created potential barriers to Indigenous candidates. This article reviews the appointment process and its two objectives of functional bilingualism and increased diversity. Given the lack of progress on diversity, particularly with respect to Indigenous representation, a rebalancing of appointment criteria is required. Reconciliation, in both the legal and evolving public policy sense, requires Indigenous participation in legal institutions. Furthermore, arguments in favour of functional bilingualism, such as specific legal expertise and incorporation of distinct cultural viewpoints, transfer seamlessly to Indigenous and other minority representation at the Supreme Court. The functional bilingualism requirement should remain, but accommodation for Indigenous candidates is integral to reconciliation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here