z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Compulsory Acquisition of the Interest of a Dissenting Minority Shareholder
Author(s) -
Avrum Maurice Flisfeder
Publication year - 1973
Publication title -
alberta law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1925-8356
pISSN - 0002-4821
DOI - 10.29173/alr2408
Subject(s) - dissenting opinion , shareholder , charter , law and economics , position (finance) , law , business , political science , economics , finance , corporate governance
The problem of dissenting minority in take-over draws into focus wider issues relating to the nature of corporate organization and the respective rights and obligations of shareholders, as well as the position of the courts in any conflict which may arise. The author examines the Anglo-Canadian approach of compulsory acquisition, with its prerequisite of the forced sale being "bona fide in the interests of the company as whole". This is contrasted to the American ap proach of charter alteration, share redemption, merger, sale of assets to new cor poration, and, perhaps more important, the right to appraisal of shares. It is sug gested that the Anglo-Canadian approach of compulsory acquisition is more convenient method of eliminating dissenting minority than that used in the United States, but that Canada should incorporate the right of appraisal of the American system, and thereby obtain the benefits of both systems.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here