z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Using a Contextual Methodology to Accommodate Equality Protections along with the Other Objectives of Government (with Particular Reference to the Income Tax Act): Not the Right Answer, Stupid. The Best Answer
Author(s) -
James Fulcher
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
alberta law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1925-8356
pISSN - 0002-4821
DOI - 10.29173/alr1087
Subject(s) - charter , supreme court , interpretation (philosophy) , law and economics , government (linguistics) , law , political science , economics , sociology , computer science , linguistics , philosophy , programming language
The article examines the judicial development of the Charter's equality provision. The author proposes a "middle-of-the-road" or contextual approach as the most preferable path for this development. He canvasses the approaches to either side of the "middle ground," those of the democrats and the civil libertarians. He argues that both of these more extreme positions should be discouraged in favour of the more "equivocal" contextual approach. After explaining how the contextual approach has arisen and been developed in recent Supreme Court cases, the author examines this methodology with respect to the interpretation of the Income Tax Act He then utilizes the methodology to resolve some difficult factual situations arising from application of the Income Tax Act.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here