z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Multilateralism and Arctic Sovereignty: Canada’s Policy Options
Author(s) -
Andrew Gibson
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the agora
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1927-4793
DOI - 10.29173/agora10088
Subject(s) - sovereignty , united nations convention on the law of the sea , arctic , archipelago , political science , treaty , multilateralism , law , power (physics) , convention , international trade , geography , politics , economics , oceanography , physics , archaeology , quantum mechanics , geology
This paper will examine Canada’s policy options regarding Canadian sovereignty over the Arctic Ocean, and will recommend a policy of multilateral engagement. Canada claims full sovereignty over the Arctic Archipelago and its surrounding waters, as well as a more limited form of sovereignty in parts of the Arctic Ocean. There is significant strategic, environmental, and economic value to uncontested Canadian control of these waters. However, these claims are not recognized by other states and contravene accepted international rules laid out in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). As Canada lacks the infrastructure and military power to effectively assert control of the region, as well as the diplomatic power to make other states recognize Canada’s claim, Canada should abandon its unilateral stance and pursue its claim through existing multilateral options: the UNCLOS and the Arctic Council. 

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here