Open AccessRisk Management Of EPC (Engineering Procurement Construction) “Siberut Agregated Biomass Gasification Power Plant” Project in Civil Engineering Design Stage
Author(s) -
Erma Damayanti,
Ronny Durrotun Nasihien
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of world conference
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2656-1174
DOI - 10.29138/prd.v2i1.130
Subject(s) - risk management , risk management plan , risk analysis (engineering) , project risk management , risk assessment , procurement , engineering , operations management , it risk management , project management , business , project management triangle , computer science , systems engineering , finance , marketing , computer security
The Construction of EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction) Siberut Aggregated Biomass Gasification Power Plant is the first power plant project in Indonesia that uses bamboo as fuel to produce electricity. Judging from the complexity of the project, it is necessary to carry out risk management for the identification and detailed analysis of the risks or uncertainties that occur in the project, especially the design engineering stage. This study uses interview methods and surveys that are implemented in the google form questionnaire to make it easier for respondents to assess risks provided. Risk assessment uses a Likert scale to determine the level of probability and impact. Next step is risk mapping to determine mitigation efforts. There are 15 independent risk variables and 1 variable risk binders obtained from interviews and literature studies. It is known that 6.67% of the risk is included in the criteria of low risk (minor risk), 73.33% of the risk is included in the criteria of moderate risk (high risk), and 20% of the risk is included in the criteria of high risk (extreme risk). From the data projected onto the risk treatment table so that the results of 6.67% risk are acceptable (acceptable), 20.00% risk is unacceptable, 73.33% undesirable risk. Risk mitigation for 16 identified risks comes from detailed specification issues, incompatibility and implementation of drawing, and multitasking engineering resources. Most risk ownership is directed to the implementing contractor, but not limited to the owner, subcontractor, planning consultant, and supervisory consultant.