Open AccessCAPACITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF ACADEMIC STAFF TO INCREASE PRODUCTIVITY AND COMPETITIVENESS OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Author(s) -
Nanang Fattah,
Sumarto Sumarto,
. Abubakar,
Ganda Mohamad Pamungkas
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal of research - granthaalayah
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2394-3629
pISSN - 2350-0530
DOI - 10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i8.2020.863
Subject(s) - higher education , transformational leadership , productivity , graduation (instrument) , service (business) , political science , public relations , sociology , marketing , business , economics , economic growth , engineering , mechanical engineering
In 2020, at the last stage, this study had some research findings related to output and outcome derived from implemented capacity development policy of the academic staff in order to approach the productivity and competitiveness of Higher Education. The method used in this research was "Mixed Method" (Creswell & Clark, 2007) which involved explanatory design and meta-analysis of case study in 11 state universities with legal entity (Perguruan Tinggi Negeri berbadan hukum, PTNbh). The conceptual framework of this study consists of 3 related main points, as follows: globalization, management of change, and determining factors of world class higher education. Based on research findings, generally Higher Education still required 1) graduate standard was determined by some aspects consisting of graduation timeliness and hiring period, relevant implementation and income, numbers of published international scientific research, citation of lecturer scientific publication; 2) standardized service offered by the university which fulfilled students' requirements with additional value added to obtain economic benefit, social and character; 3) commitment between lecturer and high education leader as an effort to achieve internationalized goals implemented in the general strategic plan; 4) networking development in a prospective of internationalized higher education. As an implication, there were so many ways to respond to megatrend which affects on change of development strategy of Higher Education, policy, leadership, and management. The change in cultural, approach, and orientation demand a person to understand the aim, benefit, and outcome. Nevertheless, the change focus was lied on the awareness of Higher Education leaders to make the changes (Conscious transformational change leadership).