z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Outcome of the pesticides peer review meeting on the OECD 106 evaluators checklist
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
efsa supporting publications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2397-8325
DOI - 10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.en-1326
Subject(s) - checklist , outcome (game theory) , content (measure theory) , computer science , peer review , psychology , world wide web , library science , medical education , internet privacy , information retrieval , political science , medicine , mathematics , law , mathematical analysis , mathematical economics , cognitive psychology
This spreadsheet has been designed to process the raw data generated from a study conducted according to OECD guideline 106. It should be used alongside the general recommendations the OECD 106 Evaluators checklist.It is principally designed for use with data from studies conducted using the INDIRECT METHOD i.e. where concentrations in the supernatant only have been measured and concentrations in the soil are calculated by the difference. It can also be used for studies using the DIRECT METHOD, with the measured data for both phases inputted into the 'Raw data' sheet. In this case the user should not make use of interpretation in the 'Initial analysis' sheet, since this includes analysis only relevant for the INDIRECT METHOD

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here