Open AccessPeer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance oxamyl
Author(s) -
Alvarez Fernando,
Arena Maria,
Auteri Domenica,
Binaglia Marco,
Federica Castoldi Anna,
Chiusolo Arianna,
Colagiorgi Angelo,
Colas Mathilde,
Crivellente Federica,
De Lentdecker Chloe,
Egsmose Mark,
Fait Gabriella,
Ferilli Franco,
Gouliarmou Varvara,
Nogareda Laia Herrero,
Ippolito Alessio,
Istace Frederique,
Jarrah Samira,
Kardassi Dimitra,
Kienzler Aude,
Lanzoni Anna,
Lava Roberto,
Leuschner Renata,
Linguadoca Alberto,
Lythgo Christopher,
Magrans Oriol,
Mangas Iris,
Miron Ileana,
Molnar Tunde,
Padovani Laura,
Parra Morte Juan Manuel,
Serafimova Rositsa,
Sharp Rachel,
Szentes Csaba,
Terron Andrea,
Theobald Anne,
Tiramani Manuela,
VillamarBouza Laura
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7296
Subject(s) - oxamyl , context (archaeology) , european union , pesticide , member states , greenhouse , risk assessment , european commission , agricultural science , business , environmental protection , toxicology , environmental science , agronomy , geography , biology , computer science , economic policy , computer security , archaeology
The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Italy, and co‐rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance oxamyl and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of oxamyl as a nematicide on potato and tobacco (field use), on tomato (permanent greenhouse), on cucurbits (edible and inedible peel), pepper, aubergine and plants nurseries of the above‐mentioned crops on soil bed preparation (permanent greenhouse). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.