
Evaluation of existing guidelines for their adequacy for the molecular characterisation and environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants obtained through synthetic biology
Author(s) -
Naegeli Hanspeter,
Bresson JeanLouis,
Dalmay Tamas,
Dewhurst Ian Crawford,
Epstein Michelle M,
Firbank Leslie George,
Guerche Philippe,
Hejatko Jan,
Moreno Francisco Javier,
Nogue Fabien,
Rostoks Nils,
Sanchez Serrano Jose Juan,
Savoini Giovanni,
Veromann Eve,
Veronesi Fabio,
Casacuberta Josep,
De Schrijver Adinda,
Messean Antoine,
Patron Nicola,
Zurbriggen Matias,
Alvarez Fernando,
Devos Yann,
Gennaro Andrea,
Streissl Franz,
Papadopoulou Nikoletta,
Mullins Ewen
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6301
Subject(s) - library science , environmental risk assessment , genetically engineered , george (robot) , microbiology and biotechnology , risk assessment , biology , management , computer science , art history , genetics , art , gene , economics
Synthetic Biology (SynBio) is an interdisciplinary field at the interface of engineering and biology aiming to develop new biological systems and impart new functions to living cells. EFSA has been asked by the European Commission to evaluate SynBio developments in agri‐food with the aim of identifying the adequacy of existing guidelines for risk assessment and determine if updated guidance is needed. The scope of this opinion covers the molecular characterisation and environmental risk assessment of such genetically modified plants obtained through SynBio, meant to be for cultivation or food and feed purposes. The previous work on SynBio by the non‐food scientific Committees (2014, 2015) was used and complemented with the output of a horizon scanning exercise, which was commissioned by the EFSA to identify the most realistic and forthcoming SynBio cases of relevance to this remit. The horizon scan did not identify other sectors/advances in addition to the six SynBio categories previously identified by the non‐food scientific committees of the European Commission. The exercise did show that plant SynBio products reaching the market in the near future (next decade) are likely to apply SynBio approaches to their development using existing genetic modification and genome editing technologies. In addition, three hypothetical SynBio case studies were selected by the working group of the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms ( GMO ), to further support the scoping exercise of this Scientific Opinion. Using the selected cases, the GMO Panel concludes that the requirements of the EU regulatory framework and existing EFSA guidelines are adequate for the risk assessment of SynBio products to be developed in the next 10 years, although specific requirements may not apply to all products. The GMO Panel acknowledges that as SynBio developments evolve, a need may exist to adjust the guidelines to ensure they are adequate and sufficient.