Open AccessPeer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance garlic extract
Author(s) -
Anastassiadou Maria,
Arena Maria,
Auteri Domenica,
Brancato Alba,
Bura Laszlo,
Carrasco Cabrera Luis,
Chaideftou Eugenia,
Chiusolo Arianna,
Marques Daniele Court,
Crivellente Federica,
De Lentdecker Chloe,
Egsmose Mark,
Fait Gabriella,
Greco Luna,
Ippolito Alessio,
Istace Frederique,
Jarrah Samira,
Kardassi Dimitra,
Leuschner Renata,
Lostia Alfonso,
Lythgo Christopher,
Magrans Oriol,
Mangas Iris,
Miron Ileana,
Molnar Tunde,
Padovani Laura,
Parra Morte Juan Manuel,
Pedersen Ragnor,
Reich Hermine,
Santos Miguel,
Serafimova Rositsa,
Sharp Rachel,
Stanek Alois,
Sturma Juergen,
Szentes Csaba,
Terron Andrea,
Tiramani Manuela,
Vagenende Benedicte,
VillamarBouza Laura
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6116
Subject(s) - amenity , context (archaeology) , member state , european commission , pesticide , agriculture , risk assessment , member states , business , european union , toxicology , environmental health , microbiology and biotechnology , medicine , biology , agronomy , ecology , management , economic policy , finance , paleontology , economics
Abstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Ireland, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Denmark, for the pesticide active substance garlic extract and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation ( EC ) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation ( EU ) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation ( EU ) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of garlic extract as a repellent, insecticide and nematicide on a wide range of crops in agriculture, horticulture, amenity. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.