Open AccessPeer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance benalaxyl
Author(s) -
Anastassiadou Maria,
Arena Maria,
Auteri Domenica,
Brancato Alba,
Bura Laszlo,
Carrasco Cabrera Luis,
Chaideftou Eugenia,
Chiusolo Arianna,
Court Marques Daniele,
Crivellente Federica,
De Lentdecker Chloe,
Egsmose Mark,
Fait Gabriella,
Greco Luna,
Ippolito Alessio,
Istace Frederique,
Jarrah Samira,
Kardassi Dimitra,
Leuschner Renata,
Lostia Alfonso,
Lythgo Christopher,
Magrans Oriol,
Mangas Iris,
Miron Ileana,
Molnar Tunde,
Padovani Laura,
Parra Morte Juan Manuel,
Pedersen Ragnor,
Reich Hermine,
Santos Miguel,
Serafimova Rositsa,
Sharp Rachel,
Stanek Alois,
Sturma Juergen,
Szentes Csaba,
Terron Andrea,
Tiramani Manuela,
Vagenende Benedicte,
VillamarBouza Laura
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5985
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , european commission , pesticide , member states , member state , risk assessment , business , environmental health , environmental planning , environmental protection , toxicology , european union , medicine , environmental science , geography , biology , computer science , computer security , agronomy , archaeology , economic policy
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Romania and co‐rapporteur Member State Portugal for the pesticide active substance benalaxyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation ( EU ) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of benalaxyl as a fungicide on tomatoes, flowers and ornamentals (field and protected use) and in grapes, onion and potato (field use). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.