Open AccessSafety assessment of the process Sharpak Bridgewater, based on Starlinger Decon technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials
Author(s) -
Silano Vittorio,
Barat Baviera José Manuel,
Bolognesi Claudia,
Brüschweiler Beat Johannes,
Chesson Andrew,
Cocconcelli Pier Sandro,
Crebelli Riccardo,
Gott David Michael,
Grob Konrad,
Mortensen Alicja,
Riviere Gilles,
Steffensen IngerLise,
Tlustos Christina,
Van Loveren Henk,
Vernis Laurence,
Zorn Holger,
Dudler Vincent,
Milana Maria Rosaria,
Papaspyrides Constantine,
Tavares Poças Maria de Fátima,
Lioupis Alexandros,
Lampi Evgenia
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5832
Subject(s) - food contact materials , human decontamination , waste management , residence time (fluid dynamics) , environmental science , materials science , food packaging , continuous flow , process engineering , pulp and paper industry , chemistry , food science , engineering , biochemical engineering , geotechnical engineering
Abstract The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids ( CEP ) assessed the safety of the recycling process Sharpak Bridgewater ( EU register number RECYC 166). The input is hot washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) ( PET ) flakes originating from collected post‐consumer PET containers, mainly bottles, with no more than 5% PET from non‐food consumer applications. The flakes are preheated before being submitted to solid‐state polycondensation ( SSP ) in a continuous reactor at high temperature under vacuum and gas flow. Having examined the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that the preheating (step 2) and the decontamination in the continuous SSP reactor (step 3) are the critical steps that determine the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters to control the performance of these critical steps are temperature, pressure, residence time and gas flow. It was demonstrated that this recycling process is able to ensure that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below the conservatively modelled migration of 0.1 μg/kg food. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the recycled PET obtained from this process when used at up to 100% for the manufacture of materials and articles for contact with all types of foodstuffs for long‐term storage at room temperature, with or without hotfill, is not considered of safety concern. Trays made of this recycled PET are not intended to be used, in microwave and conventional ovens and such use is not covered by this evaluation.