z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Scientific statement on the coverage of bats by the current pesticide risk assessment for birds and mammals
Author(s) -
HernándezJerez Antonio,
Adriaanse Paulien,
Aldrich Annette,
Berny Philippe,
Coja Tamara,
Duquesne Sabine,
Gimsing Anne Louise,
Marina Marinovich,
Millet Maurice,
Pelkonen Olavi,
Pieper Silvia,
Tiktak Aaldrik,
Tzoulaki Ioanna,
Widenfalk Anneli,
Wolterink Gerrit,
Russo Danilo,
Streissl Franz,
Topping Christopher
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5758
Subject(s) - pesticide , foraging , mammal , biology , risk assessment , exposure assessment , zoology , pesticide residue , sentinel species , ecology , toxicology , environmental health , medicine , computer security , computer science
Bats are an important group of mammals, frequently foraging in farmland and potentially exposed to pesticides. This statement considers whether the current risk assessment performed for birds and ground dwelling mammals exposed to pesticides is also protective of bats. Three main issues were addressed. Firstly, whether bats are toxicologically more or less sensitive than the most sensitive birds and mammals. Secondly, whether oral exposure of bats to pesticides is greater or lower than in ground dwelling mammals and birds. Thirdly, whether there are other important exposure routes relevant to bats. A large variation in toxicological sensitivity and no relationship between sensitivity of bats and bird or mammal test‐species to pesticides could be found. In addition, bats have unique traits, such as echolocation and torpor which can be adversely affected by exposure to pesticides and which are not covered by the endpoints currently selected for wild mammal risk assessment. The current exposure assessment methodology was used for oral exposure and adapted to bats using bat‐specific parameters. For oral exposure, it was concluded that for most standard risk assessment scenarios the current approach did not cover exposure of bats to pesticide residues in food. Calculations of potential dermal exposure for bats foraging during spraying operations suggest that this may be a very important exposure route. Dermal routes of exposure should be combined with inhalation and oral exposure. Based on the evidence compiled, the Panel concludes that bats are not adequately covered by the current risk assessment approach, and that there is a need to develop a bat‐specific risk assessment scheme. In general, there was scarcity of data to assess the risks for bat exposed to pesticides. Recommendations for research are made, including identification of alternatives to laboratory testing of bats to assess toxicological effects.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here