Open AccessPeer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance beta‐cyfluthrin
Author(s) -
Arena Maria,
Auteri Domenica,
Barmaz Stefania,
Brancato Alba,
Brocca Daniela,
Bura Laszlo,
Carrasco Cabrera Luis,
Chiusolo Arianna,
Civitella Consuelo,
Court Marques Daniele,
Crivellente Federica,
Ctverackova Lucie,
De Lentdecker Chloe,
Egsmose Mark,
Erdos Zoltan,
Fait Gabriella,
Ferreira Lucien,
Greco Luna,
Ippolito Alessio,
Istace Frederique,
Jarrah Samira,
Kardassi Dimitra,
Leuschner Renata,
Lostia Alfonso,
Lythgo Christopher,
Magrans Jose Oriol,
Medina Paula,
Mineo Desire,
Miron Ileana,
Molnar Tunde,
Padovani Laura,
Parra Morte Juan Manuel,
Pedersen Ragnor,
Reich Hermine,
Sacchi Angela,
Santos Miguel,
Serafimova Rositsa,
Sharp Rachel,
Stanek Alois,
Streissl Franz,
Sturma Juergen,
Szentes Csaba,
Tarazona Jose,
Terron Andrea,
Theobald Anne,
Vagenende Benedicte,
Van Dijk Joanke,
VillamarBouza Laura
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5405
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , risk assessment , member state , business , environmental health , pesticide , european commission , cyfluthrin , member states , toxicology , medicine , european union , computer security , biology , computer science , paleontology , deltamethrin , agronomy , economic policy
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Germany and co‐rapporteur Member State Hungary for the pesticide active substance beta‐cyfluthrin are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation ( EU ) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of beta‐cyfluthrin as an insecticide on beet, potato, wheat and greenhouse tomato. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.