Open AccessPeer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cypermethrin
Author(s) -
Arena Maria,
Auteri Domenica,
Barmaz Stefania,
Brancato Alba,
Brocca Daniela,
Bura Laszlo,
Carrasco Cabrera Luis,
Chiusolo Arianna,
Civitella Consuelo,
Court Marques Daniele,
Crivellente Federica,
Ctverackova Lucie,
De Lentdecker Chloe,
Egsmose Mark,
Erdos Zoltan,
Fait Gabriella,
Ferreira Lucien,
Greco Luna,
Ippolito Alessio,
Istace Frederique,
Jarrah Samira,
Kardassi Dimitra,
Leuschner Renata,
Lostia Alfonso,
Lythgo Christopher,
Magrans Jose Oriol,
Medina Paula,
Mineo Desire,
Miron Ileana,
Molnar Tunde,
Padovani Laura,
Parra Morte Juan Manuel,
Pedersen Ragnor,
Reich Hermine,
Sacchi Angela,
Santos Miguel,
Serafimova Rositsa,
Sharp Rachel,
Stanek Alois,
Streissl Franz,
Sturma Juergen,
Szentes Csaba,
Tarazona Jose,
Terron Andrea,
Theobald Anne,
Vagenende Benedicte,
Van Dijk Joanke,
VillamarBouza Laura
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5402
Subject(s) - cypermethrin , context (archaeology) , european commission , member state , member states , risk assessment , pesticide , environmental health , toxicology , business , european union , biology , medicine , ecology , computer security , computer science , international trade , paleontology
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Belgium and co‐rapporteur Member State Germany for the pesticide active substance cypermethrin are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation ( EU ) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of cypermethrin as an insecticide on winter and spring cereals, winter and spring oilseed rape and potato. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.