Open AccessPeer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance florpyrauxifen (variant assessed florpyrauxifen‐benzyl)
Author(s) -
Arena Maria,
Auteri Domenica,
Barmaz Stefania,
Brancato Alba,
Brocca Daniela,
Bura Laszlo,
Carrasco Cabrera Luis,
Chaideftou Eugenia,
Chiusolo Arianna,
Civitella Consuelo,
Court Marques Daniele,
Crivellente Federica,
Ctverackova Lucie,
De Lentdecker Chloe,
Egsmose Mark,
Erdos Zoltan,
Fait Gabriella,
Ferreira Lucien,
Goumenou Marina,
Greco Luna,
Ippolito Alessio,
Istace Frederique,
Jarrah Samira,
Kardassi Dimitra,
Leuschner Renata,
Lostia Alfonso,
Lythgo Christopher,
Magrans Jose Oriol,
Medina Paula,
Mineo Desiree,
Miron Ileana,
Molnar Tunde,
Padovani Laura,
Parra Morte Juan Manuel,
Pedersen Ragnor,
Reich Hermine,
Sacchi Angela,
Santos Miguel,
Serafimova Rositsa,
Sharp Rachel,
Stanek Alois,
Streissl Franz,
Sturma Juergen,
Szentes Csaba,
Tarazona Jose,
Terron Andrea,
Theobald Anne,
Vagenende Benedicte,
Van Dijk Joanke,
VillamarBouza Laura
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5378
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , parliament , risk assessment , environmental health , pesticide , controlled substance , drug , member state , active ingredient , european union , member states , medicine , business , pharmacology , political science , computer security , biology , law , computer science , paleontology , agronomy , politics , medical prescription , economic policy
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authority of the rapporteur Member State, Italy, for the pesticide active substance florpyrauxifen‐benzyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative use of florpyrauxifen‐benzyl as an herbicide on rice. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.