Open AccessPeer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance chlorothalonil
Author(s) -
Arena Maria,
Auteri Domenica,
Barmaz Stefania,
Bellisai Giulia,
Brancato Alba,
Brocca Daniela,
Bura Laszlo,
Byers Harry,
Chiusolo Arianna,
Court Marques Daniele,
Crivellente Federica,
De Lentdecker Chloe,
Egsmose Mark,
Erdos Zoltan,
Fait Gabriella,
Ferreira Lucien,
Goumenou Marina,
Greco Luna,
Ippolito Alessio,
Istace Frederique,
Jarrah Samira,
Kardassi Dimitra,
Leuschner Renata,
Lythgo Christopher,
Magrans Jose Oriol,
Medina Paula,
Miron Ileana,
Molnar Tunde,
Nougadere Alexandre,
Padovani Laura,
Parra Morte Juan Manuel,
Pedersen Ragnor,
Reich Hermine,
Sacchi Angela,
Santos Miguel,
Serafimova Rositsa,
Sharp Rachel,
Stanek Alois,
Streissl Franz,
Sturma Juergen,
Szentes Csaba,
Tarazona Jose,
Terron Andrea,
Theobald Anne,
Vagenende Benedicte,
Verani Alessia,
VillamarBouza Laura
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5126
Subject(s) - chlorothalonil , context (archaeology) , european commission , member state , environmental health , risk assessment , pesticide , member states , business , environmental protection , european union , medicine , environmental science , geography , computer security , computer science , biology , archaeology , economic policy , agronomy
The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Belgium, for the pesticide active substance chlorothalonil are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of chlorothalonil as a fungicide on wheat, barley, tomato and potato. The reliable endpoints, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.