
Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis NCIMB 42149 as a silage additive for all animal species
Author(s) -
Rychen Guido,
Aquilina Gabriele,
Azimonti Giovanna,
Bampidis Vasileios,
De Lourdes Bastos Maria,
Bories Georges,
Chesson Andrew,
Cocconcelli Pier Sandro,
Flachowsky Gerhard,
Gropp Jürgen,
Kolar Boris,
Kouba Maryline,
Lopez Puente Secundino,
LopezAlonso Marta,
Mantovani Alberto,
Mayo Baltasar,
Ramos Fernando,
Villa Roberto Edoardo,
Wallace Robert John,
Wester Pieter,
Brozzi Rosella,
Saarela Maria
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4616
Subject(s) - silage , lactobacillus brevis , food science , biology , feed additive , antibiotics , microbiology and biotechnology , bacteria , lactobacillus plantarum , lactic acid , genetics , broiler
Lactobacillus brevis is a technological additive intended to improve the ensiling process at a minimum proposed dose of 1 × 10 8 colony‐forming units ( CFU )/kg fresh material. The species L. brevis is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment and not to require specific demonstration of safety other than the susceptibility to antibiotics of human and veterinary significance. Although identity was established, the strain was found resistant to ampicillin and clindamycin and may pose a risk for the spread of genes coding for resistance to these antibiotics. Therefore, the use of this strain as a silage additive is not considered safe for target animals, and consumers of products from animals fed the treated silage. In the absence of data, no conclusion can be drawn on the skin and eye irritancy or skin sensitisation of the additive. The additive should be considered as a potential respiratory sensitiser. Although L . brevis is ubiquitous in the environment, due to its antibiotic resistance, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the extent of the risk of horizontal gene transfer to other bacteria in the environment. Six studies with laboratory‐scale silos were made using forage of differing water‐soluble carbohydrate content. Replicate silos containing forages treated at the proposed application rate were compared to identical silos containing the same but untreated forage. After opening and exposure to air, an increase of 3°C over ambient was taken to indicate aerobic deterioration. The additive showed a potential to significantly improve the aerobic stability of silage produced from easy, moderately difficult and difficult to ensile forage at a minimum application rate of 1 × 10 8 CFU /kg plant material.