Open AccessSafety assessment of the process ‘Polisan Hellas S.A.’, based on Polymetrix (formerly Buhler) technology, used to recycle post‐consumer PET into food contact materials
Author(s) -
Flavourings
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
efsa journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.076
H-Index - 97
ISSN - 1831-4732
DOI - 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4463
Subject(s) - food contact materials , human decontamination , countercurrent exchange , inert , food packaging , process (computing) , process engineering , environmental science , residence time (fluid dynamics) , materials science , waste management , pet food , continuous flow , pulp and paper industry , chemistry , food science , computer science , medicine , biochemical engineering , engineering , geotechnical engineering , operating system , organic chemistry , anatomy
This scientific opinion of the EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) deals with the safety evaluation of the recycling process Polisan Hellas S.A. ( EU register No RECYC 128), which is based on the Polymetrix (formerly Buhler) technology. The input of this process is hot washed and dried poly(ethylene terephthalate) ( PET ) flakes originating from collected post‐consumer PET containers, mainly bottles, containing no more than 5% of PET from non‐food consumer applications. Through this process, washed and dried PET flakes are extruded into pellets, crystallised and subsequently decontaminated in a continuous countercurrent reactor under high temperature and inert gas flow. The recovered PET is mixed with at least 67% by mass of virgin PET before the main decontamination step. Having examined the challenge test provided, the Panel concluded that the third step, the decontamination in continuous countercurrent reactor for solid‐state polycondensation ( SSP ), is the critical step that determines the decontamination efficiency of the process. The operating parameters that control its performance are well defined and are temperature, residence time and gas flow. The operating parameters of this step in the process are at least as severe as those used in the challenge tests. Under these conditions, it was demonstrated that the recycling process under evaluation is able to ensure that the level of migration of potential unknown contaminants into food is below a conservatively modelled migration of 0.1 μg/kg food. Therefore, the Panel concluded that the PET obtained from this process (containing at least 67% virgin PET input), intended to be used up to 100% for the manufacture of materials and articles for contact with all types of foodstuffs for long‐term storage at room temperature, with or without hotfill, is not considered of safety concern. Trays made of this PET are not intended to be used, and should not to be used in microwave and conventional ovens.