z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Five-Year Risk of Basal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence After a Conventional Surgical Excision
Author(s) -
Bruno Duarte,
L Vieira,
Luís Mata Ribeiro,
Tomás Pessoa e Costa,
Alexandre João,
Alice Varanda,
Joana Cabete
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
revista da sociedade portuguesa de dermatologia e venereologia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2182-2409
pISSN - 2182-2395
DOI - 10.29021/spdv.78.2.1174
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , confidence interval , proportional hazards model , surgery , confounding , cohort , retrospective cohort study , biopsy , carcinoma , basal (medicine) , insulin
Basal cell carcinomas are mostly treated surgically, mostly by surgery with postoperative histopathologic margin evaluation (“conventional surgery”), but large long-term data regarding recurrence by completeness of excisions is limited. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of basal cell carcinomas treated by conventional surgery at different medical specialties in a large tertiary centre, between 2008 and 2014. Survival analysis with a Cox proportional-hazards was performed, stratified by completeness of excision (complete excision/incomplete excision) and adjusted to several potentially confounding covariates. Results: A total of 2876 basal cell carcinomas were identified, of which 2306 (2100 primary, 206 recurrent) were considered eligible for analysis. During the 5-years of follow-up, there were 80 (4%) recurrences among 1980 complete excisions (16/1000 cases-year) and 83 (23.9%) recurrences among 348 incomplete excisions (100/1000 cases-year). Survival analysis was performed with multivariable adjustment. In the final adjusted model, we identified an association between relapse and re-intervention on recurrent tumors [adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.20 (95% Confidence interval (IC), 1.26-3.84), p=0.006], a wrong preoperative clinical diagnosis/surgery devoid of preoperative biopsy [adjusted HR 2.75 (95% CI, 1.68-4.5), p<0.001], treatment prior to 2012 [adjusted HR 1.47 (95% IC, 1.06-2.05), p<0.021] and surgery on a high-risk location, accordingly to the NCCN stratification [adjusted HR 2.18 (95% CI, 1.08-4.40), p<0.030]. By specific anatomic location, the likelihood of recurrence was especially high in the nose [adjusted HR 3.18 (95% CI 1.71-5.87), p<0.001] and eyelids [adjusted HR 3.08 (95% CI, 1.32-7.17), p=0.009]. There was also a trend towards higher recurrence in aggressive histological subtypes [adjusted HR 1.43 (95% CI 0.99-2.07), p<0.058]. Conclusion: Recurrent basal cell carcinomas, regardless of location, and primary basal cell carcinomas on high-risk locations of the face, especially on the eyelids and nose, should be considered to have a higher and independent likelihood of recurrence, even on “complete excisions” evaluated by histopathology. On the other hand, wait-andsee approaches in incompletely excised BCCs should be considered against a significant 5-year risk of relapse (1 in 10 lesions).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here