Open AccessJudgement in geotechnical engineering practice
Author(s) -
José António Mateus de Brito
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
soils and rocks/soils and rocks
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.161
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 2675-5475
pISSN - 1980-9743
DOI - 10.28927/sr.2021.063821
Subject(s) - judgement , heuristics , engineering , accident (philosophy) , component (thermodynamics) , engineering ethics , risk analysis (engineering) , management science , civil engineering , computer science , political science , law , business , epistemology , philosophy , physics , thermodynamics , operating system
Professional judgement is the basis for many of the decisions taken by geotechnical engineers to make progress in the design, execution and works supervision. Judgment is a mandatory component of any engineering achievement, essential to assess the various uncertainties that inevitably affect engineering practice. Confidence in such judgements can result in small to big consequences, not only for the engineer itself, but also for others, sometimes with the risk of human loss and significant damage. The definition and the development of judgment in geotechnical engineering is discussed. The bases of the judgement are analysed in detail and the heuristics and bias, responsible for failures in the judgment, are identified. The importance of experts’ judgement and codification are highlighted and ways to improve judgment are also described. The lessons learned in a case study of one accident and two incidents that have occurred during the execution of the Lisbon Terreiro do Paço metro station construction works are presented to highlight the importance of an informed decision making informed through the engineering judgement.