Open AccessCompliance-Gaining Theory as a Method to Analyze U.S. Support of the Free Syrian Army (FSA)
Author(s) -
Peter Karleskint,
Jonathan Matusitz
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of geography, politics and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2451-2249
pISSN - 2084-0497
DOI - 10.26881/jpgs.2021.4.03
Subject(s) - compromise , superpower , obligation , compliance (psychology) , blame , government (linguistics) , political science , authorization , law and economics , law , public relations , social psychology , psychology , sociology , computer security , politics , computer science , philosophy , linguistics
This paper examines U.S. support of the Free Syrian Army (FSA) through compliance-gaining theory. By and large, the theory describes how one party is able to get another party to comply with specific demands. The particular compliance-gaining tactics explored in this analysis are ingratiation, debt, guilt, and compromise. Thanks to these tactics, we can better understand how a rebel group like the FSA has managed to convince a superpower like the U.S. to support it, in spite of the historical implications of supporting rebel groups in the past. To make its compliance-gaining stronger, the FSA has played up ideas or concepts like oil, trust, blame, obligation, and past U.S. military interventions to collaborate with the U.S. so as to bring down the Syrian government and, by the same token, resist Russian influence in Syria.