Open AccessCeftriaxone versus ampicillin/cloxacillin as antibiotic prophylaxis in elective caesarean section
Author(s) -
Elseddeeg Ahmed,
Omer Ahmed Mirghani,
Abdul-Salam Gerais,
Ishag Adam
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
eastern mediterranean health journal/eastern mediterranean health journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.442
H-Index - 47
eISSN - 1687-1634
pISSN - 1020-3397
DOI - 10.26719/2004.10.3.277
Subject(s) - cloxacillin , medicine , ceftriaxone , caesarean section , ampicillin , apgar score , anesthesia , antibiotics , surgery , pregnancy , birth weight , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
Wecarried out a prospective, r and omized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ceftriaxone and ampicillin/cloxacillin prophylaxis in decreasing the frequency of post-caesarean section infection-related morbidity. Two hundred patients randomly received either ceftriaxone [single dose] or ampicillin/cloxacillin [3 doses] intravenously at induction of anaesthesia. There was no statistical difference in incidence of endometritis [P = 0.34], wound infection [P = 0.44], or other febrile morbidity [P = 0.5]. Eleven babies had a low Apgar score [< 8] in the ceftriaxone group and 13 in the ampicillin/cloxacillin group [P = 0.82]. There were 2 perinatal deaths in each group. One dose of ceftriaxone was as effective as ampicillin/ cloxacillin in preventing post-caesarean section complications and is easier to administer