Assessing the Applicability of Three Approaches to Design-Oriented Research
Author(s) -
Jing Zhou,
Christopher Kueh,
Yi Lin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of contemporary educational research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2208-8474
pISSN - 2208-8466
DOI - 10.26689/jcer.v5i8.2411
Subject(s) - computer science , interview , management science , field (mathematics) , qualitative property , process (computing) , research design , engineering design process , data science , design process , qualitative research , engineering , work in process , mathematics , machine learning , sociology , operations management , mechanical engineering , social science , anthropology , pure mathematics , operating system , statistics
The three main approaches in inquisitive research design are qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods [1]. However, recent developments in the research field have resulted in multiple other approaches, borrowing ideas from a broad range of fields. One such approach is the practice-led approach. This approach involves an efficient design process, novel qualitative interviewing methods, together with data mining procedures from quantitative data collection [2]. This paper assesses the practice-led approach used in user experience (UX) design, together with three approaches: co-design, service design, and reflective practice.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom