Open AccessCriminal Punishment Without Civil Rights: The Criminal Proceeds and Instruments Bill's Punitive Civil Sanctions
Author(s) -
Peter Wright
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
victoria university of wellington law review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1179-3082
pISSN - 1171-042X
DOI - 10.26686/vuwlr.v37i4.5586
Subject(s) - confiscation , punitive damages , sanctions , law , punishment (psychology) , political science , criminal law , criminal justice , double jeopardy , criminal procedure , criminology , sociology , psychology , social psychology
This article critiques the Criminal Proceeds and Instruments Bill 2005 which introduces a civil forfeiture regime for the proceeds of serious criminal offending. By using a civil forfeiture regime, many of the protections normally granted to criminal defendants are not available, which makes successful action by the State easier. This article argues that the Bill's civil forfeiture regime risks seriously abrogating individuals' rights, including those arising from the requirement for proof beyond a reasonable doubt and the prohibitions on double jeopardy and retrospective punishment. The article concludes that the confiscation of criminals' assets should take place within the criminal justice system to ensure that there are proper protections for defendants.