z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Load-Velocity Relationship to Predict the One-Repetition Maximum during Three Weightlifting Derivatives
Author(s) -
Ricardo Berton,
Marcos Soriano,
Demostenys David da Silva,
Marcel Lopes dos Santos,
Gustavo C. Teixeira,
Fernando Carvalheiro Reiser,
Valmor Tricoli
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
kinesiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.53
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1848-638X
pISSN - 1331-1441
DOI - 10.26582/k.53.2.4
Subject(s) - concurrent validity , reliability (semiconductor) , one repetition maximum , mathematics , limits of agreement , linear regression , statistics , physical therapy , medicine , muscle strength , nuclear medicine , physics , power (physics) , quantum mechanics , internal consistency , psychometrics
The study investigated theconcurrent validity and reliability of the load-velocity relationship topredict the one-repetition maximum (1RM) of the power clean from the knee (PCK), high pull from the knee (HPK), andmid-thigh clean pull (MTCP). For each exercise, 12 participants performed two1RM sessions tests and two sessions to measure the barbell’s load-velocityrelationship at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90% of 1RM. The velocity recorded at eachload was used to establish the linear regression equation and, consequently, topredict 1RM value. A low validity between the 1RM direct test and predicted 1RMwas observed for PCK (typical error [TE]=3.96 to 4.50 kg, coefficient ofvariation [CV]=4.68 to 5.27%, effect size [ES]=-0.76 to -0.58, Bland-Altmanbias [BAB]=9.83 to 11.19 kg), HPK (TE=4.58 to 5.82 kg, CV=6.44 to 8.14%, ES=-0.40to -0.39, BAB=3.52 to 4.17 kg), and MTCP (TE=6.33 to 8.08 kg, CV=4.78 to 6.16%,ES=-0.29 to -0.19, BAB=3.98 to 6.17 kg). Adequate reliability was observed forthe 1RM direct test and for the predicted 1RM. However, based on Bland-Altmanlimits of agreement, lower measurement errors were obtained for the 1RM directtest in comparison to the predicted 1RM for all the exercises. In conclusion,the load-velocity relationship was not able to predict 1RM values with highaccuracy in the PCK, HPK, and MTCP. Moreover, the 1RM direct test was the mostreliable for PCK, HPK and MTCP.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here