Open AccessThe dimensions of peripherization from the viewpoint of the development policy through the example of a Hungarian periphery, the Encs district
Author(s) -
Ágnes Varga,
Dávid Karácsonyi,
László Jeney
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
časopis socìalʹno-ekonomìčnoï geografìï
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2312-1130
pISSN - 2076-1333
DOI - 10.26565/2076-1333-2018-25-01
Subject(s) - backwardness , destiny (iss module) , dimension (graph theory) , disadvantaged , marxist philosophy , reproduction , political science , regional science , sociology , economics , economic growth , politics , law , physics , mathematics , astronomy , pure mathematics , ecology , biology
During the last decades many financial and other typed supports were spent for the rise of the peripheries by both the international (European) and the state development policies. However, these efforts actually are often unable to reverse the backwardness of the most disadvantaged districts. Thus the issue of peripherization is an appreciating subject of also the contemporary geographic studies. In this article we aim to analyse the different faces of the peripherization (the spatial marginalization). It is a key question what kind of factors hide behind the reproduction of the peripheries.According to some critical, neo-Marxist approaches, the peripheral existence is not a predestined situation, ‘periphery as destiny’ (Kühn, M. 2014), but a resultant of dynamic processes, the peripherization, which is reversible. The peripheries should not remain necessarily as peripheries. According to our experiences based on the example of a real Hungarian periphery, the Encs district with a typical pathway development, we would like to call the attention for the area- and dimension-specific character of the peripherization. It is argued that there are two types of peripherization; processes originated from spatial (potential) and local causes. The previous one is inevitable due to its geographic frames, the development policy can hardly do anything with it, only trying to reduce, compensate the initial handicaps through e.g. infrastructural investments, which have huge social costs. Nevertheless, the regional policy can do something with the latter, the local causes! Even a relative small district could be heterogeneous at intraregional level from the viewpoint of the peripherization. Furthermore, the lagging behind varies in different dimensions too. The success of the de-peripherization depends on some local factors (e.g. creative utilization of the supports and systematic settlement policy by the local mayors). However, the structural mismatches (e.g. not an adequate development policy for the ability for absorption of the supports) plays also a crucial role result in the reproduction of the peripheries.