About the Bargain Part’s Invalidity

The article is dedicated to the bargain part’s invalidity. The author’s point of view concerning comprehension and application the article 180 Civil Code of Russian Federation (further - CC) is formulated. The following questions - a) the sense and meaning of the rule art. 180 CC; b) the role of the objective and subjective criterions in recognition the bargain as invalid in the part; c) the phenomenon of the bargain’s part and varieties of the parts for the art. 180 CC’s application; d) the defects causing the recognition invalidity bargain in the part; e) the essence of the supposition about the importance or unimportance the defect bargain’s part in the art. 180 CC; f ) the applicability the rules of the bargain’s invalidity (§ 2 ch. 9 CC) for the invalid bargains in the part - are being investigating in detail. In the connection with recognition the bargain as invalid in the part a number of disputable and problematic moments is being discussing. They are: a) the comprehension of the objective and subjective criterions, the meaning of the objective criterion in unilateral bargains, faithful manipulation by the subjective criterion; b) the separability the part from the bargain and the problem of the defectiveness of the bargains’ essential conditions; c) the problem of formal and subjects’ defects in the connection with the recognition the bargain as invalid in the part; d) the dualism of the supposition and the kind of the presumption in the art. 180 CC’ application. Side by side with the civil law’s questions some procedural questions connected with the art. 180 CC’ application are touched upon. Stabilized in the literature opinions are subjected to the critical comprehension. As the result the attempt to graund more wide capacities for the recognition bargain as invalid in the part was undertaken. The conclusions are accompanied by a plenty of examples and references to the rules of the Civil Code Russian Federation.